The Effects of War and Peace on Foreign Aid - 825 Words

The Effects of War and Peace on Foreign Aid (Research Paper Sample) Content: THE EFFECTS OF WAR AND PEACE ON FOREIGN AIDNameCourse TitleInstitution NameCourse InstructorDateThe Effects of War and Peace on Foreign AidForeign aid refers to any form of assistance that a country may receive from another country or from internationally-established institutions such as the United Nations or IMF. This assistance may in form of finances, humanitarian aids, military aid etc. Any form of assistance from a nation to another is referred to as foreign aid. Usually, foreign aid is given to countries that are hit by epidemics or seem to be in a financial crisis that has adversely affected their economy. It should be noted that foreign aid is basically on a voluntary basis and a country is therefore, not indebted to a foreign country whenever they offer such assistance. On the other hand, a country can seek foreign aid whenever a crisis hits her. Foreign aid is not aimed at indemnifying a nation, rather, it is used to help assist in a situation that the count ry is unable to handle. For instance, when a war or an epidemic happens, other countries may offer military assistance to help contain the situation (Sachs, 2005). For instance, when some countries in Africa were hit by the Ebola Menace, a country like USA offered military help to assist in containing the situation and/or evacuations to avert a situation where the disease would have spread.It should be noted that foreign aid is a form of assistance that, for the most part of it, helps strengthen relations between countries. For instance, countries which offer foreign aid to a particular nation are usually given a first hand in investing in that nation (Harrison, 2000). This in turn, strengthens the relations and encourages the spirit of unity, peace and cooperation among nations. However, foreign aid is adversely affected in case war breaks out between nations. For instance, when a nation is at conflict with an ally, then foreign aid cannot be given form such a nation (Riddell, 2007 ). This implies that, cases of war are detrimental to the existence of cooperation between nations through foreign aid. Further, it implies that peace between nations is the only avenue through which foreign aid can be conducted effectively. Besides, it should be understood that a country cannot offer foreign aid to a nation which it is at conflict with. Further, when a nation has an ally who seems to be at war with a country it offers foreign aid, then the same services are again negatively affected. This paper will therefore discuss the effects of peace and war on foreign aid. To arrive at the conclusions statistical analysis was carried out in relation to the topic of discussion.The Effects of War of Foreign AidWar is a state of conflict between two or more parties. When countries are at war, it implies that they are not in terms and seem to disagree on one or two diplomatic issues or matters of international interest. The WW1 and WW2 represent eras that depicted a state of confl ict between countries. Foreign aid was established long ago even before the world wars and the International Crisis (Lundsgaarde, 2012). Countries could assist one another in areas such as humanitarian assistance, financial assistance and even military assistance. However, whenever a war breaks out, foreign aid is brought to a standstill (Anderson, 2009). Specifically, developed countries are the main providers of foreign aid. For the most part of it, developed countries always seem to be competing against each other in terms of development, economy, diplomacy and military competence and/or technology. When a nation is at war with another country their relationship maybe destroyed. This is because the assisting nation will shy away and stops offering any form of help to the country (Riddell, 2007).Moreover, a country may stop offering foreign aid to another country that may seem to be with at war with another country allied to it (Harrison, 2000). For instance, if China is an ally w ith the United States of America, they may stop offering foreign aid to France, if it is at war with USA. This is because China cannot afford to compromise its relation with USA over financial aid to France. This is especially when such a relationship is beneficial in comparison to the nation in question. On the other hand, if, say, USA is an ally to India, and it happens the two nations disagree on one issue of diplomacy or of international interest, then, if USA was offering foreign aid to India, then it might stop or vice versa. In essence, it should be noted that war or a state of conflict between nations compromises the effectiveness of foreign aid and a country can completely stop offering financial help to another country (Sachs, 2005).

The History of the Kitchen Blender

In 1922, Stephen Poplawski invented the blender. For those of you who have never been in a kitchen or a bar, a blender is a small electric appliance that has a tall container and blades that chop, grind, and puree food and beverages. Patented in 1922 Stephen Poplawski was the first to put a spinning blade at the bottom of a container. His beverage mixer blender was developed for the Arnold Electric Company and received Patent Number US 1480914. It is recognizable as what is called a blender in the United States and a liquidizer in Britain. It has a beverage container with a rotating agitator that is placed onto a stand containing the motor that drives the blades. This allows drinks to be mixed on the stand, then the container removed to pour out the contents and clean the vessel. The appliance was designed to make soda fountain drinks. Meanwhile, L.H. Hamilton, Chester Beach and Fred Osius formed the Hamilton Beach Manufacturing Company in 1910. It became well known for its kitchen appliances and manufactured the Poplawski design. Fred Osius later began working on ways to improve the Poplawski blender. The Waring Blender Fred Waring, a one-time Penn State architectural and engineering student, was always fascinated by gadgets. He first achieved fame fronting the big band, Fred Waring, and the Pennsylvanians, but the blender made Waring a household name. Fred Waring was the financial source and marketing force that thrust the Waring Blender into the marketplace, but it was Fred Osius who invented and patented the famous blending machine in 1933. Fred Osius knew that Fred Waring had a fondness for new inventions, and Osius need money to make improvements to his blender. Talking his way into Fred Warings dressing room following a live radio broadcast in New York’s Vanderbilt Theatre, Osius pitched his idea and received a promise from Waring to back further research. Six months and $25,000 later, the blender still suffered technical difficulties. Undaunted, Waring dumped Fred Osius and had the blender redesigned once again. In 1937, the Waring-owned Miracle Mixer blender was introduced to the public at the National Restaurant Show in Chicago retailing for $29.75. In 1938, Fred Waring renamed his Miracle Mixer Corporation as the Waring Corporation, and the mixers name was changed to the Waring Blendor, the spelling of which was eventually changed to Blender. Fred Waring went on a one-man marketing campaign that began with hotels and restaurants he visited while touring with his band and later spread to upscale stores such as Bloomingdale’s and B. Altman’s. Waring once touted the Blender to a St. Louis reporter saying, †¦this mixer is going to revolutionize American drinks. And it did. The Waring Blender became an important tool in hospitals for the implementation of specific diets, as well as a vital scientific research device. Dr. Jonas Salk used it while developing the vaccine for polio. In 1954, the millionth Waring Blender was sold, and it is still as popular today. Waring Produces are now a part of Conair.

How to Do a Quickweave Essay - 708 Words

Melissa Williams English 101 Essay 1: How to do A Quick Weave Ladies have you ever wanted to change your hairstyle and didn’t know what to do? Do you ever get tired of looking the same way? Do you want to look classy with long flowing hair? Here is a great idea for you. Quick weaves are beautiful, fast to do, and easy to maintain. It doesn’t cost a lot, and the hair would make you fall in love with yourself. You can have short, long, thin, or thick hair. It doesn’t matter this will work for you. You will receive information on the tools you need, the steps, and the styling. It is the beginning of a beautiful makeover. The main ingredient for this process is the hair extensions. You can go to the nearest beauty supply†¦show more content†¦Take the hair that’s hanging from the ponytail, pull it tight, split it in half, and gel both sides down. Sit under the dryer for one hour or until your hair is dry and hard. Once your hair is dry you are ready to start the next process. Now get ready to use your hair extensions, glue, and scissors from your supplies. Take the hair out of the packaging and unroll it. Start by laying the tracks in the back from ear to ear and work your way to the top. Once you reach the top of your head where you left the hair out, use it to cover the tracks. Now you have a beautiful quick weave that is ready to style. Long hair is what people usually prefer. With long hair you can take the straightening iron and go over the hair to make it blend. If you like short hair and want a bob pull the hair in the ponytail to the back of your head. Take the scissors and cut the hair that’s hanging out the rubber band off, and take out the rubber band. Use the straightening iron and curl the hair under and there is your bob. Play with your quick weave and style it however you want it’s your hair. Quick weaves are one of the greatest hair styles. If you never had one and you are confused, you can YouTube or Google beautiful, trendy, and popular styles. They are better than wigs, and you can change hairstyles as often as you like. If you have little or no hair and want long hair, this is definitely for you. If you have long hair and it’s thin you can use this

Powder Essay Example For Students

Powder Essay PowderMost likely written by some kind of nut, the film Powder is indeedstrange. Powder is the story of an albilno completely hairless teenager who hasthe power to use an extraordinary amount of his brain capacity. Powder is thearchetypal outsider.Edward Lightning Hands might be a more fitting name for allthe overuse of the already worn out Boo Radley-like misfit who is also adespised prophet type theme. Aside from its lack of orignality it is alsotypically hollywood in its blatant overuse of moral superlatives. The most advanced intellect in the history of mankind, is how one ofthe films many protagonistic representatives of society describes Powderseidetic memory and off the scale IQ.The writer expects the audience to view whatPowder says with more credibility because he has the use of more of his brainthan they do. This is a very powerful way for the writer to communicate theme,by developing a philosophy in an attempt to affect the audience, and havingpowder embody that philosophy so that people will see him as some sort of rolemodel. In general, this idea could work, but the writer of this particular filmobviuosly missed the boat here. Instead of the independence imbodied in most people, Powder belives in aunification of all humans, every single one, through some sort of single-consciousness. The idea of using Powder as a role model can work, but theaudience has to view powder as being worthy. Here Powder views people, unwillingto accept the idea of a single-consciousness solely on faith, as closed-minded. This dogmatic type of view nullifies any worth powder might have had as a rolemodel, and it dooms any chance the message of the film, which supposedlypresents a different, better, and higher, view of things, ever had ofinfluencing people. Besides the implied message, the film itself is just plain awful. Withclich after clich and an abundance of predictable scenes, its a wonder anyonecould think this movie was worth making. A semi-conscious two-year old couldpredict exactly what would happen next, and who would suddenly reappear in thefilm. The whole addition of a love interest was inane and irrelevant to thepoint the writer was trying to get across. The suposedly touching scenes wereobviously predictable, and although some are well acted, they add nothong butanother impractical twist to the storyOne good point about this movie is the addition of Jeff Goldblum asPowders science teacher. Whoever typecast Golblum as a nutty scientistpondering technology versus humanity really knew what they were doing, beacauseit works wonderfully. His delivery of lines in the film is impeccable, oftenmagnifying the script to more than it deserves to be. His talent as an actorshines clear and true in what is possibly the best line of the best line of themovie: you want to know why he doesnt have a hair on his body, beacause he iselectolysis..drink that in. Though powder is interesting and a bit thought provoking it is best usedas an example of what not to see at the theater. It is in the whole a poorlyconsructed and cliche film that ends up with an awkward message. In theory weare to model our lives around what Powder would do, or what he would think aboutwhat we are doing. Goldblum admits that we live in a dark age of man, where we are doing everythin we can merely so we dont kill each other. Therefore, weare supposed to live our lives as pwder would have us live them? Yeah right!Music and Movies